Dot-ocracy

Have students place a dot sticker on a blank bar chart you’ve created to cast a vote anonymously. At the end of the Dot-ocracy period, all participants can visually assess the group’s opinion through a gallery walk or whole class discussion.

Notes pinned to corkboard ©2023 Let’s Talk Science
Individual/Group Activity Group
Class SizeSmall (<25), Medium (25-50), & Large (51-200)
Bloom’s Taxonomy LevelRemember
Development InitialAbsolute Knowing
Minimum Time to Facilitate< 15 Minutes
Minimum Time to Debrief< 10 Minutes
PDFsHere
Discipline-Specific Examples

STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics)
Please contact us at activelearning@uga.edu with an example to include!

Humanities
Please contact us at activelearning@uga.edu with an example to include!

Social Sciences
Please contact us at activelearning@uga.edu with an example to include!

Co-Curricular
(experiences outside of the formal classroom but contribute to student learning)
Please contact us at activelearning@uga.edu with an example to include!

Universal Design for Active Learning

Universal Design for Active Learning
UDL and active learning share a common goal: centering all students in the learning experience. When designing an activity, UDL‑informed instructors consider how the activity could be open to all students while preserving the core learning goal.

Physical Considerations
If moving around the room is not viable, pass materials to students or offer a digital voting alternative.

Timing & Pacing
Allow adequate time to review all options before voting. Avoid pressuring quick decisions.

Social Interaction
Allow independent voting before group discussion to preserve individual perspectives.

Information Accessibility
Ensure all posted options are legible and accessible in a readable format for all students.

Ways to Participate/Express
Allow voting via dot stickers, digital polling, or written indication of preferences.

Online Adaptations

Coming Soon!

Additional Resources

Stickney, J. (2010). Reconciling forms of Asian humility with assessment practices and character education programs in North America. Ethics and Education, 5(1), 67-80: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17449641003666009?casa_token=u9YSGeUE1dAAAAAA%3AnCbXkQbt8zw51BiEviXG_nmqI-CCazj8az-HLsecDXrC-_YcR4VG9pa42fxPVk573PXuZFhtCw0

Proietti, K. E. (2019). We make the path by walking: performative pedagogy in a recovery high school (Doctoral dissertation): https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1362704X.2019.1657260?casa_token=TbvfZAk7uy4AAAAA%3APx1KskNb4HBjFcq3eMveCh4qaZfas8AiQsxgQrJMnA7ZkQq2CDT2CvSyO_jEmrfQUXTds2nvJcQ

Barry, B., & Drak, D. (2019). Intersectional interventions into queer and trans liberation: Youth resistance against right-wing populism through fashion hacking. Fashion Theory, 23(6), 679-709: https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/items/60b2d3ce-fcb5-45e9-89fb-434f17f45fe9