Categories Grid

Students are given a grid containing two or three superordinate concepts they’ve been studying, along with a scrambled list of subordinate items. Students/learners sort the subordinate terms into the correct categories quickly.

Image by Ahmad Ardity from Pixabay
Individual/Group Activity Individually
Class SizeSmall (<25), Medium (25-50), & Large (51-200)
Bloom’s Taxonomy LevelRemember
Development InitialAbsolute Knowing
Minimum Time to Facilitate<15 Minutes
Minimum Time to Debrief<5 Minutes
PDFsHere
Discipline-Specific Examples

STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics)
Please contact us at activelearning@uga.edu with an example to include!

Humanities
Please contact us at activelearning@uga.edu with an example to include!

Social Sciences
Please contact us at activelearning@uga.edu with an example to include!

Co-Curricular
(experiences outside of the formal classroom but contribute to student learning)
Please contact us at activelearning@uga.edu with an example to include!

Universal Design for Active Learning

Universal Design for Active Learning
UDL and active learning share a common goal: centering all students in the learning experience. When designing an activity, UDL‑informed instructors consider how the activity could be open to all students while preserving the core learning goal.

Physical Considerations
If handwriting is not a requirement, consider allowing students to complete the grid digitally.

Timing & Pacing
Allow more time than expected. Group work can help distribute cognitive load. Allow group work so students with varying processing speeds can collaborate.

Social Interaction
Allow individual work before group comparison. Avoid requiring immediate consensus.

Information Accessibility
When possible, allow reference to course materials when sorting to keep focus on classification, not recall.

Ways to Participate/Express
Consider allowing completion by writing, typing, or using digital sorting tools.

Online Adaptations

Coming Soon!

Additional Resources

Tan, F. B., & Hunter, M. G. (2002). The repertory grid technique: A method for the study of cognition in information systems. MIS quarterly, 39-57: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4132340?casa_token=JYdGgSCTFg0AAAAA%3AersPdv_BDdEiu-8n0UkaiR6B06x3KamXiJn7bEbMZaedV-jI-PQGHQfjI-mWp0OdwLm0R4EYUo6KwMBttI_0jiT_NmGZfGFJBqWJzBQM1t1Mre0BJQ

Tomico, O., Karapanos, E., Levy, P. D., Mizutani, N., & Yamanaka, T. (2009). The Repreptory Grid Technique as a method for the study of cultural differences. International Journal of Design, 3(3), 55-63: https://research.tue.nl/en/publications/the-repeptory-grid-technique-as-a-method-for-the-study-of-cultura

Dunn, W. N., Pavlak, T. J., & Roberts, G. E. (1987). Cognitive performance appraisal—Mapping managers’ category structures using the grid technique. Personnel Review, 16(3), 16-19: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/eb055564/full/html